In a new PMW Squad article, Lydia Hinchliff, Director Of Strategy UK at Journey Further, contends that too many businesses are running on fumes, confusing media spend with momentum, especially on platforms like Google and Meta.
If your brand dies when you turn off ads, you don’t have a business – you have a media addiction.
What happens when performance spend becomes a life support system for brands?
A common theme in conversations with senior marketers across the country is growing discomfort with how dependent their businesses have become on paid performance media. Many openly acknowledge the risks – a slight reduction in budget can cause immediate drops in revenue, and that level of exposure leaves little room to build for the future.
More worrying are the conversations that aren’t happening. When marketing leaders show no concern about over-reliance on paid performance media (or treat it as standard operating practice) it suggests a deeper issue. Dependency is being normalised, and in doing so, it is becoming commonplace for it not to be questioned.
We need to talk about performance media
Performance media should be used to scale businesses that already demonstrate strong fundamentals: a clearly defined offer, meaningful retention, and signs of demand without constant prompting. Increasingly, it is being used to keep growth targets on track in the absence of those fundamentals. Spend fills the gap, rather than amplifies what’s already working.
There are understandable reasons why this has become common. Performance media delivers results that are immediate, measurable, and scalable. With clear attribution and real-time feedback, it gives both marketers and leadership a tangible sense of control. Spend can be directly linked to return, which makes it easier to justify… and harder to question.
The cycle of addiction
This level of visibility has made performance an attractive default. It has become so effective at generating short-term results that it often overrides longer-term considerations. Rather than tackle structural issues – such as pricing strategy, positioning, or customer retention – many businesses default to acquisition to close the gap. When that pattern repeats quarter after quarter, it creates dependency.
What makes this more entrenched is the internal pressure most marketing teams operate under. Metrics like ROAS and CAC dominate reviews because they’re responsive and easy to optimise. Meanwhile, indicators that point to long-term brand health, such as recognition and customer satisfaction, are often deprioritised because their impact unfolds over time.
This environment doesn’t just encourage overuse of performance media, it limits the space for anything else. For senior marketers, the problem isn’t the presence of performance media, it’s the weight it carries. When every revenue goal, campaign success, and budget discussion is routed through paid media performance, the function becomes overly reactive. Marketing shifts from shaping demand to chasing it.
Over time, this creates exposure. When media costs rise, platforms change, or tracking becomes less reliable, the model starts to falter. The customer relationship, the value proposition, and the brand itself haven’t been developed in parallel. This leaves the business dependent on a system it doesn’t fully control.
Driving beyond performance growth
Planning for growth beyond performance doesn’t require walking away from media spend. It starts by recognising where reliance has gone unchallenged,and building a marketing strategy that creates value in more durable ways.
Performance media will continue to play an important role in the marketing mix. The priority is to ensure it’s used deliberately, in a way that aligns with broader business goals, not as the default solution to every growth challenge.
The five question health check
The starting point is clarity. Challenging assumptions, surfacing blind spots, and asking better questions across internal teams and agency partners. Questions like:
1. What happens when performance media spend is reduced by 20%?
Use this as a diagnostic to understand operational exposure rather than as a cost cutting exercise. It tests the underlying strength of the brand, the offer, and customer loyalty.
2. Where is demand coming from without paid media?
Track returning customer behaviour, direct search, organic traffic, and referral sources. These indicators offer a clearer view of brand relevance and customer intent.
3. Which parts of the funnel are dependent on paid media to function?
If awareness, conversion, and retention all rely on continuous spend, it’s worth understanding why, and identifying where to reduce friction or improve efficiency.
4. How much of the media investment is creating long-term value?
Analyse where spend is contributing to owned data, brand preference, and repeatable revenue.
5. Who is shaping the direction of our marketing, our team, the agency, or the platforms?
Ensure control and decision-making are staying close to the brand, not being deferred to algorithmic logic.
Finding the balance
Rebalancing starts with a clearer understanding of what’s driving performance. This matters even more when Digital now accounts for 82.6% of total ad spend (eMarketer, 2024). While not all of that is performance media, a significant share is used with short-term goals in mind, and many brands have unintentionally deprioritised the fundamentals: long-term positioning, brand equity, customer retention, and loyalty.
The risk is brands that don’t build beyond performance are left exposed when platforms shift, costs rise, or demand softens.
Taking a more balanced approach strengthens both marketing credibility and commercial resilience. It ensures that media spend supports something more durable: a brand people remember, a customer base that returns, and a proposition that continues to grow even when spend is paused.
As featured in Performance Marketing World